1. Home
  2. The Documentary [FAV2117]

School: Arts and Humanities

This unit information may be updated and amended immediately prior to semester. To ensure you have the correct outline, please check it again at the beginning of semester.

  • Unit Title

    The Documentary

  • Unit Code

    FAV2117

  • Year

    2019

  • Enrolment Period

    1

  • Version

    1

  • Credit Points

    15

  • Full Year Unit

     N

  • Mode of Delivery

    On Campus

  • Unit Coordinator

    Mr Keith Raymond SMITH

Description

What is documentary? This unit traces the evolution of the documentary from its inception, covering key documentary theorists, movements and filmmakers. It examines the role of the documentary as cultural intervention. Students are encouraged to develop their own documentary script proposal.

Prerequisite Rule

Students must pass 1 units from FAV1111

Equivalent Rule

Unit was previously coded CMM2107, CMM4107, FAV2107

Learning Outcomes

On completion of this unit students should be able to:

  1. Describe key historical movements in documentary and evaluate their contribution to the development of the form.
  2. Recognise and critique the different forms the documentary has taken.
  3. Apply theoretical perspectives to their own documentary practice.
  4. Develop their own documentary proposal.

Unit Content

  1. The role of documentary.
  2. Historical evolution of documentary styles.
  3. The politics of representation in documentary.
  4. Contemporary hybrid fact-fiction forms.
  5. Documentary storytelling.
  6. Community engagement and ethical practice in documentary production.

Learning Experience

Students will attend on campus classes as well as engage in learning activities through ECU Blackboard.

JoondalupMount LawleySouth West (Bunbury)
Semester 1Not Offered x 1.5 hour lectureNot Offered
Semester 1Not Offered13 x 4 hour seminarNot Offered
Semester 1Not Offered x 2.5 hour workshopNot Offered
Semester 2Not Offered13 x 1.5 hour lectureNot Offered
Semester 2Not Offered13 x 2.5 hour workshopNot Offered

For more information see the Semester Timetable

Additional Learning Experience Information

The unit consists of a weekly 4 hour teaching block. This will include lectures, screenings, seminar discussions and workshops.

Assessment

GS1 GRADING SCHEMA 1 Used for standard coursework units

Students please note: The marks and grades received by students on assessments may be subject to further moderation. All marks and grades are to be considered provisional until endorsed by the relevant Board of Examiners.

ON CAMPUS
TypeDescriptionValue
JournalTutorial Report40%
AssignmentProject60%

Core Reading(s)

  • Simpson, C. (2014). Tales of Toad Terror and Tenacity: What Cane Critters Can Teach Us. Australian Humanities Review, 57, 81–100. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.ecu.edu.au/docview/1647626191?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:wcdiscovery&accountid=10675
  • Murray, L. (2009). Review; RIP a remix manifesto. Culture Machine, (June), 1–8. Retrieved from http://svr91.edns1.com/~culturem/index.php/cm/article/viewFile/372/380
  • Forceville, C. (2017). Interactive documentary and its limited opportunities to persuade. Discourse, Context and Media, 20, 218–226. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.ecu.edu.au/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.06.004
  • Dovey, J. (2000). Klutz Films. Freakshow: First Person Media and Factual Television (pp. 27–35). London: Pluto Press. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ECU/detail.action?docID=3386072
  • Nichols, B. (2010). Documentary Modes and the Film-makers’ Voice. Introduction to Documentary (2nd ed., pp. 158–179). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Retrieved from https://ecu.on.worldcat.org/oclc/695998458
  • Nichols, B. (2010). The Participatory Mode. Introduction to Documentary (2nd ed., pp. 179–192). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Retrieved from https://ecu.on.worldcat.org/oclc/695998458
  • Borschke, M. (2011). Rethinking the Rhetoric of Remix. Media International Australia, 17–25. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.ecu.edu.au/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1114100104
  • Rutland, P. (2014). The Pussy Riot Affair: gender and national identity in Putin’s Russia. Nationalities Papers: The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity, 42(4), 575–582. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.ecu.edu.au/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2014.936933
  • Corner, J. (2008). Documentary Studies; Dimensions of transition and continuity. Rethinking documentary: new perspectives and practices (pp. 19–28). Retrieved from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ECU/detail.action?docID=361578
  • Horeck, T. (2007). From Documentary to Drama: Capturing Aileen Wuornos. Screen, 48(2), 141–159. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.ecu.edu.au/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/hjm012
  • Scott, A. (2010). Documentaries (in Name Only) of Every Stripe. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/17/movies/17scott.html?_r=1
  • Renov, M. (1993). Towards a Poetics of Documentary. M. Renov (Ed.), Theorizing Documentary (Republished 2012, pp. 21–36). London: Routledge. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ECU/detail.action?docID=1039379

Disability Standards for Education (Commonwealth 2005)

For the purposes of considering a request for Reasonable Adjustments under the Disability Standards for Education (Commonwealth 2005), inherent requirements for this subject are articulated in the Unit Description, Learning Outcomes and Assessment Requirements of this entry. The University is dedicated to provide support to those with special requirements. Further details on the support for students with disabilities or medical conditions can be found at the Access and Inclusion website.

Academic Misconduct

Edith Cowan University has firm rules governing academic misconduct and there are substantial penalties that can be applied to students who are found in breach of these rules. Academic misconduct includes, but is not limited to:

  • plagiarism;
  • unauthorised collaboration;
  • cheating in examinations;
  • theft of other students' work;

Additionally, any material submitted for assessment purposes must be work that has not been submitted previously, by any person, for any other unit at ECU or elsewhere.

The ECU rules and policies governing all academic activities, including misconduct, can be accessed through the ECU website.

FAV2117|1|1

School: Arts and Humanities

This unit information may be updated and amended immediately prior to semester. To ensure you have the correct outline, please check it again at the beginning of semester.

  • Unit Title

    The Documentary

  • Unit Code

    FAV2117

  • Year

    2019

  • Enrolment Period

    2

  • Version

    1

  • Credit Points

    15

  • Full Year Unit

     N

  • Mode of Delivery

    On Campus

  • Unit Coordinator

    Mr Keith Raymond SMITH

Description

What is documentary? This unit traces the evolution of the documentary from its inception, covering key documentary theorists, movements and filmmakers. It examines the role of the documentary as cultural intervention. Students are encouraged to develop their own documentary script proposal.

Prerequisite Rule

Students must pass 1 units from FAV1111

Equivalent Rule

Unit was previously coded CMM2107, CMM4107, FAV2107

Learning Outcomes

On completion of this unit students should be able to:

  1. Describe key historical movements in documentary and evaluate their contribution to the development of the form.
  2. Recognise and critique the different forms the documentary has taken.
  3. Apply theoretical perspectives to their own documentary practice.
  4. Develop their own documentary proposal.

Unit Content

  1. The role of documentary.
  2. Historical evolution of documentary styles.
  3. The politics of representation in documentary.
  4. Contemporary hybrid fact-fiction forms.
  5. Documentary storytelling.
  6. Community engagement and ethical practice in documentary production.

Learning Experience

Students will attend on campus classes as well as engage in learning activities through ECU Blackboard.

JoondalupMount LawleySouth West (Bunbury)
Semester 1Not Offered x 1.5 hour lectureNot Offered
Semester 1Not Offered13 x 4 hour seminarNot Offered
Semester 1Not Offered x 2.5 hour workshopNot Offered
Semester 2Not Offered13 x 1.5 hour lectureNot Offered
Semester 2Not Offered13 x 2.5 hour workshopNot Offered

For more information see the Semester Timetable

Additional Learning Experience Information

The unit consists of a weekly 4 hour teaching block. This will include lectures, screenings, seminar discussions and workshops.

Assessment

GS1 GRADING SCHEMA 1 Used for standard coursework units

Students please note: The marks and grades received by students on assessments may be subject to further moderation. All marks and grades are to be considered provisional until endorsed by the relevant Board of Examiners.

ON CAMPUS
TypeDescriptionValue
JournalTutorial Report40%
AssignmentProject60%

Core Reading(s)

  • Simpson, C. (2014). Tales of Toad Terror and Tenacity: What Cane Critters Can Teach Us. Australian Humanities Review, 57, 81–100. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.ecu.edu.au/docview/1647626191?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:wcdiscovery&accountid=10675
  • Murray, L. (2009). Review; RIP a remix manifesto. Culture Machine, (June), 1–8. Retrieved from http://svr91.edns1.com/~culturem/index.php/cm/article/viewFile/372/380
  • Forceville, C. (2017). Interactive documentary and its limited opportunities to persuade. Discourse, Context and Media, 20, 218–226. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.ecu.edu.au/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.06.004
  • Dovey, J. (2000). Klutz Films. Freakshow: First Person Media and Factual Television (pp. 27–35). London: Pluto Press. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ECU/detail.action?docID=3386072
  • Nichols, B. (2010). Documentary Modes and the Film-makers’ Voice. Introduction to Documentary (2nd ed., pp. 158–179). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Retrieved from https://ecu.on.worldcat.org/oclc/695998458
  • Nichols, B. (2010). The Participatory Mode. Introduction to Documentary (2nd ed., pp. 179–192). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Retrieved from https://ecu.on.worldcat.org/oclc/695998458
  • Borschke, M. (2011). Rethinking the Rhetoric of Remix. Media International Australia, 17–25. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.ecu.edu.au/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1114100104
  • Rutland, P. (2014). The Pussy Riot Affair: gender and national identity in Putin’s Russia. Nationalities Papers: The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity, 42(4), 575–582. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.ecu.edu.au/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2014.936933
  • Corner, J. (2008). Documentary Studies; Dimensions of transition and continuity. Rethinking documentary: new perspectives and practices (pp. 19–28). Retrieved from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ECU/detail.action?docID=361578
  • Horeck, T. (2007). From Documentary to Drama: Capturing Aileen Wuornos. Screen, 48(2), 141–159. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.ecu.edu.au/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/hjm012
  • Scott, A. (2010). Documentaries (in Name Only) of Every Stripe. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/17/movies/17scott.html?_r=1
  • Renov, M. (1993). Towards a Poetics of Documentary. M. Renov (Ed.), Theorizing Documentary (Republished 2012, pp. 21–36). London: Routledge. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ECU/detail.action?docID=1039379

Disability Standards for Education (Commonwealth 2005)

For the purposes of considering a request for Reasonable Adjustments under the Disability Standards for Education (Commonwealth 2005), inherent requirements for this subject are articulated in the Unit Description, Learning Outcomes and Assessment Requirements of this entry. The University is dedicated to provide support to those with special requirements. Further details on the support for students with disabilities or medical conditions can be found at the Access and Inclusion website.

Academic Misconduct

Edith Cowan University has firm rules governing academic misconduct and there are substantial penalties that can be applied to students who are found in breach of these rules. Academic misconduct includes, but is not limited to:

  • plagiarism;
  • unauthorised collaboration;
  • cheating in examinations;
  • theft of other students' work;

Additionally, any material submitted for assessment purposes must be work that has not been submitted previously, by any person, for any other unit at ECU or elsewhere.

The ECU rules and policies governing all academic activities, including misconduct, can be accessed through the ECU website.

FAV2117|1|2