School: Business and Law

This unit information may be updated and amended immediately prior to semester. To ensure you have the correct outline, please check it again at the beginning of semester.

  • Unit Title

    Managing Project Quality
  • Unit Code

    MAN6302
  • Year

    2016
  • Enrolment Period

    1
  • Version

    1
  • Credit Points

    20
  • Full Year Unit

    N
  • Mode of Delivery

    On Campus
    Online

Description

Project quality management describes the processes required to ensure that the project will satisfy the needs for which it was undertaken. There are three phases in this process: quality planning which includes identifying which quality standards are relevant to the project, determining how to satisfy them and how and when they'll be measured; quality assurance which involves periodic evaluation to ensure that project inputs and outcomes will satisfy the relevant quality standards; and, quality control which involves monitoring specific project results to ensure that they comply with the relevant quality standards while identifying ways to improve both product and process. Achieving planned levels of quality requires effective communication between team members and other stakeholders. Skills in managing relationships are critical in achieving stakeholder satisfaction through all stages of the project. This unit teaches the technical and soft skills required for managing project quality and provides students with an opportunity to discover how these skills are used in the workplace.

Non Standard Timetable Requirements

This unit may be offered in intensive weekend mode.

Learning Outcomes

On completion of this unit students should be able to:

  1. Analyse project procurement quality issues in various project settings.
  2. Analyse project quality issues in various project settings (e.g. geographically distributed project team members, cultural differences).
  3. Argue the quality case for procurement choices (buy or build, single vs. multiple suppliers) in various project contexts.
  4. Design outputs that would contribute to the successful management of quality in a project.
  5. Develop strategies that encourage innovation and continuous improvement in project teams.
  6. Formulate inputs into the various project quality processes.
  7. Summarize the key factors impacting on project quality.
  8. Use appropriate tools and techniques for managing quality in these processes.

Unit Content

  1. Development of quality theory.
  2. Innovation and continuous improvement.
  3. Managing project quality issues in the project closeout stage.
  4. Managing the project quality assurance and control processes.
  5. Project quality outputs.
  6. Project quality planning inputs.
  7. Project quality tools and techniques.
  8. Quality in project procurement.
  9. Team development.

Additional Learning Experience Information

On-campus students attend a combination of seminar and laboratory experiences that cover three hours per week over one semester. Learning activities and assignments will develop communication and analytical abilities of students as well as providing opportunities to discover, discuss and apply theory in a meaningful context. Students studying in off campus mode will access the program via Blackboard and regular on line access is required. Students need to be actively engaged in the unit by reading the required readings, listening to any recorded lectures and participating in the review quizzes and exercises with answers that are posted on the Blackboard. An executive mode version may also be offered from time to time, based on four full day workshops, generally offered on Saturdays and/or Sundays. Assessment methods are designed to encourage and facilitate learning. They provide students with the opportunity to undertake independent off-campus research to determine how managing quality is achieved in the contemporary workplace and to analyse these practices. This provides exposure to the workplace, networking opportunities and community engagement.

Assessment

GS1 GRADING SCHEMA 1 Used for standard coursework units

Students please note: The marks and grades received by students on assessments may be subject to further moderation. All marks and grades are to be considered provisional until endorsed by the relevant Board of Examiners.

ON CAMPUS
TypeDescriptionValue
Research PaperQuality management in practice50%
ExaminationFinal examination50%
ONLINE
TypeDescriptionValue
Research PaperQuality management in practice50%
ExaminationFinal examination50%

Text References

  • ^ Foster, S. (2009). Managing quality: An integrative approach (4th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Project Management Institute. (2011). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (4th ed.). Newton Square, PA: PMI.
  • Kloppenborg, T., & Petrick, J. (2002). Managing project quality. Vienna USA: Management Concepts.

Journal References

  • Quality Management Journal
  • International Journal of Project Management
  • Journal of Quality Management

^ Mandatory reference


Disability Standards for Education (Commonwealth 2005)

For the purposes of considering a request for Reasonable Adjustments under the Disability Standards for Education (Commonwealth 2005), inherent requirements for this subject are articulated in the Unit Description, Learning Outcomes and Assessment Requirements of this entry. The University is dedicated to provide support to those with special requirements. Further details on the support for students with disabilities or medical conditions can be found at the Access and Inclusion website.

Academic Misconduct

Edith Cowan University has firm rules governing academic misconduct and there are substantial penalties that can be applied to students who are found in breach of these rules. Academic misconduct includes, but is not limited to:

  • plagiarism;
  • unauthorised collaboration;
  • cheating in examinations;
  • theft of other students' work;

Additionally, any material submitted for assessment purposes must be work that has not been submitted previously, by any person, for any other unit at ECU or elsewhere.

The ECU rules and policies governing all academic activities, including misconduct, can be accessed through the ECU website.

MAN6302|1|1

School: Business and Law

This unit information may be updated and amended immediately prior to semester. To ensure you have the correct outline, please check it again at the beginning of semester.

  • Unit Title

    Managing Project Quality
  • Unit Code

    MAN6302
  • Year

    2016
  • Enrolment Period

    2
  • Version

    1
  • Credit Points

    20
  • Full Year Unit

    N
  • Mode of Delivery

    On Campus
    Online

Description

Project quality management describes the processes required to ensure that the project will satisfy the needs for which it was undertaken. There are three phases in this process: quality planning which includes identifying which quality standards are relevant to the project, determining how to satisfy them and how and when they'll be measured; quality assurance which involves periodic evaluation to ensure that project inputs and outcomes will satisfy the relevant quality standards; and, quality control which involves monitoring specific project results to ensure that they comply with the relevant quality standards while identifying ways to improve both product and process. Achieving planned levels of quality requires effective communication between team members and other stakeholders. Skills in managing relationships are critical in achieving stakeholder satisfaction through all stages of the project. This unit teaches the technical and soft skills required for managing project quality and provides students with an opportunity to discover how these skills are used in the workplace.

Non Standard Timetable Requirements

This unit may be offered in intensive weekend mode.

Learning Outcomes

On completion of this unit students should be able to:

  1. Analyse project procurement quality issues in various project settings.
  2. Analyse project quality issues in various project settings (e.g. geographically distributed project team members, cultural differences).
  3. Argue the quality case for procurement choices (buy or build, single vs. multiple suppliers) in various project contexts.
  4. Design outputs that would contribute to the successful management of quality in a project.
  5. Develop strategies that encourage innovation and continuous improvement in project teams.
  6. Formulate inputs into the various project quality processes.
  7. Summarize the key factors impacting on project quality.
  8. Use appropriate tools and techniques for managing quality in these processes.

Unit Content

  1. Development of quality theory.
  2. Innovation and continuous improvement.
  3. Managing project quality issues in the project closeout stage.
  4. Managing the project quality assurance and control processes.
  5. Project quality outputs.
  6. Project quality planning inputs.
  7. Project quality tools and techniques.
  8. Quality in project procurement.
  9. Team development.

Additional Learning Experience Information

On-campus students attend a combination of seminar and laboratory experiences that cover three hours per week over one semester. Learning activities and assignments will develop communication and analytical abilities of students as well as providing opportunities to discover, discuss and apply theory in a meaningful context. Students studying in off campus mode will access the program via Blackboard and regular on line access is required. Students need to be actively engaged in the unit by reading the required readings, listening to any recorded lectures and participating in the review quizzes and exercises with answers that are posted on the Blackboard. An executive mode version may also be offered from time to time, based on four full day workshops, generally offered on Saturdays and/or Sundays. Assessment methods are designed to encourage and facilitate learning. They provide students with the opportunity to undertake independent off-campus research to determine how managing quality is achieved in the contemporary workplace and to analyse these practices. This provides exposure to the workplace, networking opportunities and community engagement.

Assessment

GS1 GRADING SCHEMA 1 Used for standard coursework units

Students please note: The marks and grades received by students on assessments may be subject to further moderation. All marks and grades are to be considered provisional until endorsed by the relevant Board of Examiners.

ON CAMPUS
TypeDescriptionValue
Research PaperQuality management in practice50%
ExaminationFinal examination50%
ONLINE
TypeDescriptionValue
Research PaperQuality management in practice50%
ExaminationFinal examination50%

Text References

  • ^ Foster, S. (2009). Managing quality: An integrative approach (4th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Project Management Institute. (2011). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (4th ed.). Newton Square, PA: PMI.
  • Kloppenborg, T., & Petrick, J. (2002). Managing project quality. Vienna USA: Management Concepts.

Journal References

  • Quality Management Journal
  • International Journal of Project Management
  • Journal of Quality Management

^ Mandatory reference


Disability Standards for Education (Commonwealth 2005)

For the purposes of considering a request for Reasonable Adjustments under the Disability Standards for Education (Commonwealth 2005), inherent requirements for this subject are articulated in the Unit Description, Learning Outcomes and Assessment Requirements of this entry. The University is dedicated to provide support to those with special requirements. Further details on the support for students with disabilities or medical conditions can be found at the Access and Inclusion website.

Academic Misconduct

Edith Cowan University has firm rules governing academic misconduct and there are substantial penalties that can be applied to students who are found in breach of these rules. Academic misconduct includes, but is not limited to:

  • plagiarism;
  • unauthorised collaboration;
  • cheating in examinations;
  • theft of other students' work;

Additionally, any material submitted for assessment purposes must be work that has not been submitted previously, by any person, for any other unit at ECU or elsewhere.

The ECU rules and policies governing all academic activities, including misconduct, can be accessed through the ECU website.

MAN6302|1|2