School: Science

This unit information may be updated and amended immediately prior to semester. To ensure you have the correct outline, please check it again at the beginning of semester.

  • Unit Title

    Applied Intelligence
  • Unit Code

    SCY2120
  • Year

    2016
  • Enrolment Period

    1
  • Version

    1
  • Credit Points

    15
  • Full Year Unit

    N
  • Mode of Delivery

    On Campus
    Online

Description

This unit introduces students to intelligence analysis methodologies commonly used by national security and law enforcement agencies. Students will explore fundamental issues in information evaluation and the role of ethics in intelligence analysis. The development of intelligence products appropriate to both tactical and operational requirements will be emphasised.

Learning Outcomes

On completion of this unit students should be able to:

  1. At the conclusion of this unit the student should be able to:
  2. Evaluate information and sources in terms of reliability, credibility and validity.
  3. Explain the relationship between analysts and decision makers.
  4. Explain what is ethical in intelligence analysis.
  5. Formulate quality tactical and operational intelligence products.
  6. Recognise the influence of bias, culture and context as it impacts evaluation, analysis and the development of intelligence products.
  7. Select and evaluate intelligence analysis methodologies appropriate to analytical tasks and the nature and source of the information available.

Unit Content

  1. Data interpretation.
  2. Ethics and intelligence.
  3. Evaluation.
  4. Information structuring for analysis.
  5. Intelligence failure.
  6. Operational versus strategic assessment.
  7. The analyst decision maker relationship.
  8. The intelligence analyst.
  9. The intelligence inference.
  10. The intelligence product.

Additional Learning Experience Information

Lectures, tutorials, seminars and workshops. Students are exposed to a range of national and international materials and case studies which also represent real life scenarios providing them with skills relevant for industry. Such skills include teamwork which is developed within the class structure and strong report writing skills which are developed through the unit assessments.

Assessment

GS1 GRADING SCHEMA 1 Used for standard coursework units

Students please note: The marks and grades received by students on assessments may be subject to further moderation. All marks and grades are to be considered provisional until endorsed by the relevant Board of Examiners.

ON CAMPUS
TypeDescriptionValue
Case StudyCase Study Analysis20%
ReportReport30%
ProjectProject50%
ONLINE
TypeDescriptionValue
Case StudyCase Study Analysis20%
ReportReport30%
ProjectProject50%

Text References

  • ^ Heuer, R. J., Jr., & Pherson, R. H. (2010). Structured analytic techniques for intelligence analysis. Washington: CQ Press.
  • Bloch, J., (2003). Global Intelligence. London: Zed Books
  • Boba, R. (2005). Crime Analysis and Crime Mapping. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Johnston, R. (2005). Analytic Culture in the US Intelligence Community: An Ethnographic Study. Washington: Center for the Study of Intelligence.
  • Khalsa, S. (2004). Forecasting Terrorism Indicators and Proven Techniques. Lanham: Scarecrow Press.
  • Krizan, L. (1999). Intelligence Essentials for Everyone. Washington: Joint Military Intelligence College.
  • Perry, D. (2009). Partly Cloudy Ethics in War, Espionage, Covert Action and Interrogation. Lanham: Scarecrow Press.
  • Swenson, R. G. (Ed.). (2003). Bringing Intelligence About Practitioners Reflect on Best Practices. Washington: Joint Military Intelligence College.

Journal References

  • Intelligence & National Security
  • Conflict Security & Development
  • International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence
  • International Security
  • Police Practice and Research
  • Policing and Society
  • Security Studies
  • Studies in Conflict and Terrorism
  • Survival
  • Terrorism & Political Violence
  • Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism Journal

^ Mandatory reference


Disability Standards for Education (Commonwealth 2005)

For the purposes of considering a request for Reasonable Adjustments under the Disability Standards for Education (Commonwealth 2005), inherent requirements for this subject are articulated in the Unit Description, Learning Outcomes and Assessment Requirements of this entry. The University is dedicated to provide support to those with special requirements. Further details on the support for students with disabilities or medical conditions can be found at the Access and Inclusion website.

Academic Misconduct

Edith Cowan University has firm rules governing academic misconduct and there are substantial penalties that can be applied to students who are found in breach of these rules. Academic misconduct includes, but is not limited to:

  • plagiarism;
  • unauthorised collaboration;
  • cheating in examinations;
  • theft of other students' work;

Additionally, any material submitted for assessment purposes must be work that has not been submitted previously, by any person, for any other unit at ECU or elsewhere.

The ECU rules and policies governing all academic activities, including misconduct, can be accessed through the ECU website.

SCY2120|1|1

School: Science

This unit information may be updated and amended immediately prior to semester. To ensure you have the correct outline, please check it again at the beginning of semester.

  • Unit Title

    Applied Intelligence
  • Unit Code

    SCY2120
  • Year

    2016
  • Enrolment Period

    2
  • Version

    1
  • Credit Points

    15
  • Full Year Unit

    N
  • Mode of Delivery

    On Campus
    Online

Description

This unit introduces students to intelligence analysis methodologies commonly used by national security and law enforcement agencies. Students will explore fundamental issues in information evaluation and the role of ethics in intelligence analysis. The development of intelligence products appropriate to both tactical and operational requirements will be emphasised.

Learning Outcomes

On completion of this unit students should be able to:

  1. At the conclusion of this unit the student should be able to:
  2. Evaluate information and sources in terms of reliability, credibility and validity.
  3. Explain the relationship between analysts and decision makers.
  4. Explain what is ethical in intelligence analysis.
  5. Formulate quality tactical and operational intelligence products.
  6. Recognise the influence of bias, culture and context as it impacts evaluation, analysis and the development of intelligence products.
  7. Select and evaluate intelligence analysis methodologies appropriate to analytical tasks and the nature and source of the information available.

Unit Content

  1. Data interpretation.
  2. Ethics and intelligence.
  3. Evaluation.
  4. Information structuring for analysis.
  5. Intelligence failure.
  6. Operational versus strategic assessment.
  7. The analyst decision maker relationship.
  8. The intelligence analyst.
  9. The intelligence inference.
  10. The intelligence product.

Additional Learning Experience Information

Lectures, tutorials, seminars and workshops. Students are exposed to a range of national and international materials and case studies which also represent real life scenarios providing them with skills relevant for industry. Such skills include teamwork which is developed within the class structure and strong report writing skills which are developed through the unit assessments.

Assessment

GS1 GRADING SCHEMA 1 Used for standard coursework units

Students please note: The marks and grades received by students on assessments may be subject to further moderation. All marks and grades are to be considered provisional until endorsed by the relevant Board of Examiners.

ON CAMPUS
TypeDescriptionValue
Case StudyCase Study Analysis20%
ReportReport30%
ProjectProject50%
ONLINE
TypeDescriptionValue
Case StudyCase Study Analysis20%
ReportReport30%
ProjectProject50%

Text References

  • ^ Heuer, R. J., Jr., & Pherson, R. H. (2010). Structured analytic techniques for intelligence analysis. Washington: CQ Press.
  • Bloch, J., (2003). Global Intelligence. London: Zed Books
  • Boba, R. (2005). Crime Analysis and Crime Mapping. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Johnston, R. (2005). Analytic Culture in the US Intelligence Community: An Ethnographic Study. Washington: Center for the Study of Intelligence.
  • Khalsa, S. (2004). Forecasting Terrorism Indicators and Proven Techniques. Lanham: Scarecrow Press.
  • Krizan, L. (1999). Intelligence Essentials for Everyone. Washington: Joint Military Intelligence College.
  • Perry, D. (2009). Partly Cloudy Ethics in War, Espionage, Covert Action and Interrogation. Lanham: Scarecrow Press.
  • Swenson, R. G. (Ed.). (2003). Bringing Intelligence About Practitioners Reflect on Best Practices. Washington: Joint Military Intelligence College.

Journal References

  • Intelligence & National Security
  • Conflict Security & Development
  • International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence
  • International Security
  • Police Practice and Research
  • Policing and Society
  • Security Studies
  • Studies in Conflict and Terrorism
  • Survival
  • Terrorism & Political Violence
  • Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism Journal

^ Mandatory reference


Disability Standards for Education (Commonwealth 2005)

For the purposes of considering a request for Reasonable Adjustments under the Disability Standards for Education (Commonwealth 2005), inherent requirements for this subject are articulated in the Unit Description, Learning Outcomes and Assessment Requirements of this entry. The University is dedicated to provide support to those with special requirements. Further details on the support for students with disabilities or medical conditions can be found at the Access and Inclusion website.

Academic Misconduct

Edith Cowan University has firm rules governing academic misconduct and there are substantial penalties that can be applied to students who are found in breach of these rules. Academic misconduct includes, but is not limited to:

  • plagiarism;
  • unauthorised collaboration;
  • cheating in examinations;
  • theft of other students' work;

Additionally, any material submitted for assessment purposes must be work that has not been submitted previously, by any person, for any other unit at ECU or elsewhere.

The ECU rules and policies governing all academic activities, including misconduct, can be accessed through the ECU website.

SCY2120|1|2